1.) Stallman says that copyrights should be able to expire after some time, is this a good idea? Would this solve propriety problems with software?
2.) Source code is understood by human beings, not computers so does that mean when computing source code into machine code, humans will always have an important job? (this is reassuring with all the fear that machines are going to take over)
3.) Kristi Grisbi says that open source software is too risky and unpredictable compared to her own software system, do people think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this situation? Otherwise why would people ever even consider using open source if their privacy is exposed?
4.) Stallman is making money from requesting the source codes from companies and taking their business away from them.. is this even legal?
5.) Stallman says free software is "software that respects your freedom," what exactly does this mean? What defines freedom? Freedom for individuals or groups?
#3 - I don't know who Kristi Grisbi is, but it is actually not true at all that open source software is too risky -- the widest used web server software, Apache RedHat, which drives 66% of all web servers is Open Source and is the most secure...
ReplyDelete#1 - copyright does actually expire, altho in the US lawmakers are constantly lengthening it at the behest of powerful industrial (publishing, media, etc) interests: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Copyright_term.svg