This presentation was about women in the gaming and
technology fields and showing how they are (under)represented. That was
interesting to me because our MIT class is split pretty evenly between the
genders, but the field as a whole is definitely male dominated. Yasmin Kafai,
the speaker, posed the question, “do we need to design different technologies
and games for girls?” She said that the reason girls aren’t playing video games
as often as boys are is because lack of interest or lack of experience. Girls
assume video games are a boys game, and therefore do not play. It was very eye
opening to see a woman in the information technology sector explaining how
girls are stereotyped against as video game consumers. She said that most video
games are designed by men for men and that the only women characters
are either passive (princess) or oversexualized. The typical video game
directed at girls is “Barbie” where you get to dress her up and do her hair. How are children ever supposed to challenge
gender roles when this industry is feeding stereotypes into their hands? We
need to move away from gender as difference to gender as performance. Even when
they are young, girls are supposed to play with dolls and boys are supposed to
play with cars. I loved the SNL skit about “Chess for Girls” mocking that the
only way girls would play chess is if the pieces had cute outfits are hair. If
a girl doesn’t feel the way a “typical” girl does with these feminine
inclinations, she is instantly shunned. This goes beyond the technology field,
but to socialization in our culture itself. Yasmin also talks about girls as
video game developers, where females created wonderful, thought provoking games
that encourage learning for either gender of children, not catered specifically
to either. The speaker encourages everyone of all ages to be a video game
creator! She even talks about kids who can do it, so I know I definitely could.
I never considered it before because I also assume the stereotypical gaming
industry as a place for boys and their toys where I am not welcome.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
ATLAS Speaker Series: Digital Media Design, Gender & Games
Digital Media Design, Gender & Games
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Remix Culture Questions (Group 1)
1. When I hear "Remix Culture," I immediately think of the discussion we had in class last week about "Girl Talk" and how the deejay takes others songs and remixes them into his own. Remix culture could also be a culture where no content is original anymore, that everything (every sound, idea, logo, shape...) came from somewhere else first. This is definitely apparent in music and films, where I feel like I keep seeing the same story/chorus over and over again. How many remakes of classic movies and songs do we have to hear and see? That leads the question of is the remake even considered original work or will it always just be a remake? I assume this means that anyone is a producer and anyone is a consumer in our culture.
2. The biggest consequence of remix culture is that nothing is original anymore. The remixers are "technically" stealing work of others but not getting in trouble for it... So is nothing protected? What about those copyright laws we fight so hard for? Are you only a thief if you steal a tangible good? Music is created and lots of time is spent into making it so it should have the similar consequences. Remix culture is even affecting innovation. If people are scared to create because they do not think that they will get the proper money or recognition for their work, then our society stops moving forward completely. But aren't we all innovators? Isn't that how great things are created by building on something and making it even better? Every good idea had to start somewhere, can we copyright and protect every single inspiration?
2. The biggest consequence of remix culture is that nothing is original anymore. The remixers are "technically" stealing work of others but not getting in trouble for it... So is nothing protected? What about those copyright laws we fight so hard for? Are you only a thief if you steal a tangible good? Music is created and lots of time is spent into making it so it should have the similar consequences. Remix culture is even affecting innovation. If people are scared to create because they do not think that they will get the proper money or recognition for their work, then our society stops moving forward completely. But aren't we all innovators? Isn't that how great things are created by building on something and making it even better? Every good idea had to start somewhere, can we copyright and protect every single inspiration?
Labels:
copyrights,
create,
group 1,
IPR,
music,
original,
presentations,
protection,
remix
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
IPR, Copyright/ Left, CC Questions (Group 12)
http://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/450/wipo_pub_450.pdf
1. When searching to make sure that no other trademarks are similar to the new proposal, what guidelines does the committee follow to make that decision? What justifies something being too similar or different?
I really like the line, "The progress and well-being of humanity rest on its capacity to create and invent new works in the areas of technology and culture..." This is an interesting perspective and I think it is so true. Without protection of ideas, no new products could ever be designed and created and without this creation, there would be no progress. The core idea of our society is to create and continue moving forward with new ideas and this can only happen with IPRs improving the quality of life. Nothing we take for granted such as movies and medicine, would exist without this system. Until this article, I had no idea how important this system really was. I have this great idea for a new product, but clearly I can't post it online because someone will try to steal it and make it their own since it isn't patented. I like this though, because it protects from idea theft which can take away recognition or even money from the rightful owner. I also never thought about industrial designs being patented, I always assumed it was s free-for-all, so this was interesting news to me.
1. When searching to make sure that no other trademarks are similar to the new proposal, what guidelines does the committee follow to make that decision? What justifies something being too similar or different?
I really like the line, "The progress and well-being of humanity rest on its capacity to create and invent new works in the areas of technology and culture..." This is an interesting perspective and I think it is so true. Without protection of ideas, no new products could ever be designed and created and without this creation, there would be no progress. The core idea of our society is to create and continue moving forward with new ideas and this can only happen with IPRs improving the quality of life. Nothing we take for granted such as movies and medicine, would exist without this system. Until this article, I had no idea how important this system really was. I have this great idea for a new product, but clearly I can't post it online because someone will try to steal it and make it their own since it isn't patented. I like this though, because it protects from idea theft which can take away recognition or even money from the rightful owner. I also never thought about industrial designs being patented, I always assumed it was s free-for-all, so this was interesting news to me.
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Digital Divide Questions (Group 11)
1. To me, the digital divide is the difference in knowledge and access in technology between classes. It is the gap between the haves and the have-nots. The poor people do not know how to use technology the way the rich do because they do not have access or the ability to ever learn.
2. This video was very interesting to me! It is amazing to me how different their society in India is compared to our lives in America. Parveen's village didn't even have electricity until six months ago, her mother left school at age eight, and she rides her bike to school; something that we Americans can't even fathom. I am confused as to why Parveen's school makes the children pay every month to use the computers. It is also surprising that a school of 500 has only three computers. I guess I take for granted how lucky I am to live in a society where every student has their own personal computer and houses have up to four per home. Not only is there a huge divide between U.S. and India, but even between villages in India. The digital divide is prominent everywhere throughout the world. If we work to close this knowledge gap, the world as a whole could be so much more educated and advanced.
2. This video was very interesting to me! It is amazing to me how different their society in India is compared to our lives in America. Parveen's village didn't even have electricity until six months ago, her mother left school at age eight, and she rides her bike to school; something that we Americans can't even fathom. I am confused as to why Parveen's school makes the children pay every month to use the computers. It is also surprising that a school of 500 has only three computers. I guess I take for granted how lucky I am to live in a society where every student has their own personal computer and houses have up to four per home. Not only is there a huge divide between U.S. and India, but even between villages in India. The digital divide is prominent everywhere throughout the world. If we work to close this knowledge gap, the world as a whole could be so much more educated and advanced.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)